Strategy execution: the five critical elements
- Andy Poulter

- Feb 9
- 3 min read
Updated: Feb 10

The question we get asked regularly at April Strategy is deceptively simple: "How do we actually deliver our strategy?"
It's a question that reveals something important. Most organisations can develop a strategy. They analyse markets, assess opportunities, and identify priorities.
Then execution begins. And the gap between plan and reality becomes painfully apparent.
After years of supporting clients to accelerate execution, we've observed a consistent pattern: brilliant strategies fail not because the thinking was wrong, but because five critical elements weren't in place before execution began.
The five elements of strategy execution
Clarity on direction Everyone must understand what needs delivering, when it needs to land, and who owns each outcome - not vague alignment where people nod in meetings then interpret things differently, but genuine clarity where anyone in the organisation can explain what matters most and why. Ambiguity kills momentum faster than bad strategy ever does. When people aren't clear on priorities, they make assumptions. They work at cross-purposes. They wait for clarification that never arrives. Meanwhile, the strategy sits in a document whilst confusion reigns.
Shared ownership Strategy can't be something leadership announces and expects everyone to execute. It needs to be something people genuinely own. A compelling narrative helps people understand why this matters and how they contribute. Momentum comes from engagement, not instruction. When people understand the why behind the what, they bring discretionary effort. They solve problems proactively. They adapt when circumstances change. Without shared ownership, you get compliance at best and passive resistance at worst.
Capability and capacity Having the right people with the right skills, secured early and empowered to deliver, is where most strategies encounter their first major obstacle. Too many organisations assume capability exists simply because they need it to. They announce ambitious priorities without honestly assessing whether people can actually deliver them. They expect teams to develop new skills whilst simultaneously maintaining full workloads. Strategy needs genuine capability, not hope. And capability takes time to build. If your people don't possess the required skills today, your timeline needs to account for developing them. Otherwise, you're planning for failure whilst pretending to plan for success.
Realistic investment A ring-fenced budget should reflect what delivery actually requires - not what you'd like it to cost. And acceptance that you won't get everything perfect the first time. Without adequate investment, even sound strategies stall. Teams make do with insufficient resources so corners get cut and quality suffers. The strategy gets watered down until it barely resembles the original vision. Investment isn't just financial. It's time, attention, and the willingness to prioritise this work over other competing demands. If you're not prepared to invest properly, question whether you should pursue the strategy at all.
Enabling governance Governance is often where strategies go to die slowly. Clear decision rights, appropriate risk management, and fast escalation are needed. Good governance accelerates progress. It clarifies who can decide what. It enables appropriate risk-taking. It ensures the right information reaches decision-makers quickly. Bad governance becomes the constraint that stops everything from moving. Monthly committees mean every decision takes weeks. Unclear authority means everything gets escalated. Excessive oversight means nothing happens without multiple approvals.
The execution challenge
Here's the uncomfortable truth: developing a strategy is easier than delivering it.
Execution requires honest assessment of readiness - acknowledging gaps between what you have and what you need. It requires courage to invest properly even when budgets are tight. It requires discipline to create the conditions where delivery can succeed rather than assuming those conditions already exist.
The organisations that thrive aren't those with the most sophisticated strategies. They're the ones ruthlessly focused on creating the foundations that enable delivery.
Strategy is just a document until you build the capability, investment, governance, and engagement required to make it real.
Are you building those foundations, or assuming they'll somehow appear?




Comments